Comments on: Show 001 – An Interview with Avi Rubin http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=show-001 Cigital CTO Gary McGraw discusses software security with security gurus. Sun, 13 May 2012 16:44:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: dedicated hosting providers http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-149 dedicated hosting providers Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:05:51 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-149 I would prefer to start out my very own blog one day. This was a seriously wonderful blog that you just created here. Maintain up the accomplishment :Pll I would prefer to start out my very own blog one day. This was a seriously wonderful blog that you just created here. Maintain up the accomplishment :P ll

]]> By: Faustina Bierwirth http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-148 Faustina Bierwirth Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:30:34 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-148 I have taken notice that in cameras, extraordinary receptors help to maintain focus automatically. These sensors with some camcorders change in in the area of contrast, while others work with a beam involving infra-red (IR) light, particularly in low light. Higher specs cameras at times use a combination of both methods and probably have Face Priority AF where the video camera can 'See' a new face and concentrate only on that. Thank you for sharing your thinking on this site. I have taken notice that in cameras, extraordinary receptors help to maintain focus automatically. These sensors with some camcorders change in in the area of contrast, while others work with a beam involving infra-red (IR) light, particularly in low light. Higher specs cameras at times use a combination of both methods and probably have Face Priority AF where the video camera can ‘See’ a new face and concentrate only on that. Thank you for sharing your thinking on this site.

]]> By: Tackett http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-17 Tackett Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:20:50 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-17 Like the post! Thank you Like the post! Thank you

]]> By: Gerald Niblett http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-16 Gerald Niblett Wed, 25 May 2011 20:30:39 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-16 What a amazing web site! I extremely like all of the advice you have right here. I plan on bookmarking this for upcoming research. I highly recommend you up-date this routinely. What a amazing web site! I extremely like all of the advice you have right here. I plan on bookmarking this for upcoming research. I highly recommend you up-date this routinely.

]]> By: Esther Romack http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-15 Esther Romack Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:08:11 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-15 hey i <STRONG><a href="http://www.pc-tricks.info" rel="nofollow">Think</A></STRONG> your blog is good i found it on google i will come back one day hey i Think your blog is good i found it on google i will come back one day

]]> By: Form 16 http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-13 Form 16 Mon, 28 Feb 2011 04:48:20 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-13 Thanks for the article ...... nice one…… I liked very much....... Thanks for the article …… nice one……
I liked very much…….

]]> By: Mark http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-12 Mark Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:07:32 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-12 Two comments: 1. I have enjoyed what I have heard so far. 2. Everytime my iTunes checks for new episodes it tries to get a fresh copy of episode 1. Episode 2 does not have this problem. Any help would be appreciated. Keep up the good work. Two comments:
1. I have enjoyed what I have heard so far.
2. Everytime my iTunes checks for new episodes it tries to get a fresh copy of episode 1. Episode 2 does not have this problem. Any help would be appreciated.

Keep up the good work.

]]> By: Kevin W. Wall http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-11 Kevin W. Wall Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:07:10 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-11 _Before_ people start correcting me, I'll correct myself. Apparently, I don't remember my Brooks as well as I thought. (Gary...you should have caught me on that one!) Brook's "No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering" was published in IEEE Computer in April 1987, not in CACM as I originally stated. (Apologies to IEEE Computer Society, but when you're old enough to remember using punched cards, one should be permitted to forget such details. Should have done my homework though and double-checked instead of going by memory. I'll blame in on a parity error.) Anyway, for those you haven't read this classic paper, you can find it at: http://www.computer.org/portal/site/computer/menuitem.eb7d70008ce52e4b0ef1bd108bcd45f3/index.jsp?&pName=computer_level1&path=computer/homepage/misc/Brooks&file=index.xml&xsl=article.xsl& Also, in the _ACM Queue_ for this month, Alex E. Bell reminds us in "Software Development Amidst the Whiz of Silver Bullets..." that we *still* haven't gotten it after all these years. You can find the current month of _ACM Queue_ at http://www.acmqueue.org/. _Before_ people start correcting me, I’ll correct myself. Apparently, I don’t remember my Brooks as well as I thought. (Gary…you should have caught me on that one!)

Brook’s “No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering” was published in IEEE Computer in April 1987, not in CACM as I originally stated. (Apologies to IEEE Computer Society, but when you’re old enough to remember using punched cards, one should be permitted to forget such details. Should have done my homework though and double-checked instead of going by memory. I’ll blame in on a parity error.)

Anyway, for those you haven’t read this classic paper, you can find it at:
http://www.computer.org/portal/site/computer/menuitem.eb7d70008ce52e4b0ef1bd108bcd45f3/index.jsp?&pName=computer_level1&path=computer/homepage/misc/Brooks&file=index.xml&xsl=article.xsl&amp;

Also, in the _ACM Queue_ for this month, Alex E. Bell reminds us in “Software Development Amidst the Whiz of Silver Bullets…” that we *still* haven’t gotten it after all these years. You can find the current month of _ACM Queue_ at http://www.acmqueue.org/.

]]> By: gem http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-10 gem Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:06:16 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-10 Here is a pointer to the Brooks paper that Kevin talked about. It was published by the IEEE, not the ACM. Brooks, Frederick P., "No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering," Computer, Vol. 20, No. 4 (April 1987) pp. 10-19. http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~maratb/readings/NoSilverBullet.html Of course now we know that the claim that "there is no silver bullet" is patently false. Hah hah hah. gem Here is a pointer to the Brooks paper that Kevin talked about. It was published by the IEEE, not the ACM.

Brooks, Frederick P., “No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering,” Computer, Vol. 20, No. 4 (April 1987) pp. 10-19.

http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~maratb/readings/NoSilverBullet.html

Of course now we know that the claim that “there is no silver bullet” is patently false. Hah hah hah.

gem

]]> By: Kevin W. Wall http://www.cigital.com/silver-bullet/show-001/#comment-9 Kevin W. Wall Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:05:38 +0000 http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet/show-001/#comment-9 Not realizing that April 1st came late this year, I naively took the troll bait posted by Gary McGraw to the Securing Coding mailing list (SC-L@securecoding.org). Fortunately, I didn't reply to the entire list and make a fool of myself. (Instead, I waited until now to embarass myself in front of an even larger audience. ;-) In looking back, both Gary and I thought that others might enjoy our private dialogue, and thus I agreed to share this discussion with the world. (Of course, now I will have to go into hiding in the FBI's witness protection program, but I digress.) A final note before we begin. The views expressed belong soley to Gary and myself and do not represent the views or opinions of our respective companies. (And I have over 200 lines of discarded disclaimers to prove it!) On Monday, May 15, 2006 8:33 PM, Gary McGraw posted to the Secure Coding List... gem>>> To: SC-L@securecoding.org gem>>> Subject: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview) gem>>> gem>>> Hi all, gem>>> gem>>> Tomorrow, we'll announce the existence of the Silver Bullet gem>>> Security Podcast with Gary McGraw. Woo hoo. The first gem>>> interview is with Avi Rubin. This activity is sponsored by gem>>> IEEE S&P Magazine...who by now all sc-l readers should know well! gem>>> gem>>> See www.cigital.com/silverbullet gem>>> gem>>> Hope you all like it! gem>>> gem>>> gem On Tue 5/16/2006 11:22 AM, Kevin Wall responded... kww>> To: Gary McGraw kww>> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview) kww>> kww>> "Silver Bullet" Security Podcast ??? Argh!!! kww>> kww>> Really Gary. You of all people. You disappoint me. How could you let kww>> those yahoos > who came up with that name get away with that? Make kww>> them go back and read Brook's classic "No Silver Bullet: Essence and kww>> Accidents of Software Engineering" article. kww>> kww>> Didn't you tell them with an name like "Silver Bullet", they were kww>> instantly going to loose any credibility that they might kww>> otherwise have had (at least to those who are clueful enough kww>> to have read Brooks' article)? kww>> kww>> -kevin On Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:41 AM, Gary McGraw responded... gem>> To: Wall, Kevin gem>> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview) gem>> gem>> gem>> Hah. Kevin, dude, it's a JOKE. It's irony. gem>> gem>> Supposed to be funny. Sorry it hit you wrong. gem>> gem>> gem On Tue 5/16/2006 12:39 PM, Kevin Wall replied... kww> To: Gary McGraw kww> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview) kww> kww> Phew... for a moment there, I thought Citigal was being kww> taken over by evil marketing droids or that (much worse) you had kww> turned to the dark side (i.e., clueless management ;-) kww> kww> -kevin On Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:52 PM, Gary McGraw replied... gem> To: Wall, Kevin gem> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview) gem> gem> Still giggling over here. gem> gem> gem Finally, on Tue May 16 13:11:27 2006, Kevin Wall wrote... To: Gary McGraw Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview) Gary, Well, I'm glad to here that you hadn't given in to the partial lobotomy (which seems to be mandatory with most organizations I've worked with) or been abducted and brainwashed by space aliens. ;-) I guess I'm just overly sensitive to the "Silver Bullet" name because at least twice in the past, at two different companies I've worked for, I've had to work with IT development organizations who in all seriousness had officially named themselves something like "Silver Bullet Organization" and THEY were not doing it for the irony....they were just clueless and had never read Brooks' Silver Bullet CACM article. ---- That's when Gary asked me to post this thread on the comments to the website. So, while I remembered my Brooks, I forgot that other famous sage whose name starts with 'B' and who incorrectly is credited with saying "there's a sucker born every minute". Sigh. Somebody give me a blanket to hide under. (And make it a wool one, to go with my sheepish grin.) Regards, -kevin wall Not realizing that April 1st came late this year, I naively took the troll bait posted by Gary McGraw to the Securing Coding mailing list (SC-L@securecoding.org). Fortunately, I didn’t reply to the entire list and make a fool of myself. (Instead, I waited until now to embarass myself in front of an even larger audience. ;-)

In looking back, both Gary and I thought that others might enjoy our private dialogue, and thus I agreed to share this discussion with the world. (Of course, now I will have to go into hiding in the FBI’s witness protection program, but I digress.)

A final note before we begin. The views expressed belong soley to Gary and myself and do not represent the views or opinions of our respective companies. (And I have over 200 lines of discarded disclaimers to prove it!)

On Monday, May 15, 2006 8:33 PM, Gary McGraw posted to the Secure Coding List…
gem>>> To: SC-L@securecoding.org
gem>>> Subject: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)
gem>>>
gem>>> Hi all,
gem>>>
gem>>> Tomorrow, we’ll announce the existence of the Silver Bullet
gem>>> Security Podcast with Gary McGraw. Woo hoo. The first
gem>>> interview is with Avi Rubin. This activity is sponsored by
gem>>> IEEE S&P Magazine…who by now all sc-l readers should know well!
gem>>>
gem>>> See http://www.cigital.com/silverbullet
gem>>>
gem>>> Hope you all like it!
gem>>>
gem>>> gem

On Tue 5/16/2006 11:22 AM, Kevin Wall responded…
kww>> To: Gary McGraw
kww>> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)
kww>>
kww>> “Silver Bullet” Security Podcast ??? Argh!!!
kww>>
kww>> Really Gary. You of all people. You disappoint me. How could you let
kww>> those yahoos > who came up with that name get away with that? Make
kww>> them go back and read Brook’s classic “No Silver Bullet: Essence and
kww>> Accidents of Software Engineering” article.
kww>>
kww>> Didn’t you tell them with an name like “Silver Bullet”, they were
kww>> instantly going to loose any credibility that they might
kww>> otherwise have had (at least to those who are clueful enough
kww>> to have read Brooks’ article)?
kww>>
kww>> -kevin

On Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:41 AM, Gary McGraw responded…
gem>> To: Wall, Kevin
gem>> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)
gem>>
gem>>
gem>> Hah. Kevin, dude, it’s a JOKE. It’s irony.
gem>>
gem>> Supposed to be funny. Sorry it hit you wrong.
gem>>
gem>> gem

On Tue 5/16/2006 12:39 PM, Kevin Wall replied…
kww> To: Gary McGraw
kww> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)
kww>
kww> Phew… for a moment there, I thought Citigal was being
kww> taken over by evil marketing droids or that (much worse) you had
kww> turned to the dark side (i.e., clueless management ;-)
kww>
kww> -kevin

On Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:52 PM, Gary McGraw replied…
gem> To: Wall, Kevin
gem> Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)
gem>
gem> Still giggling over here.
gem>
gem> gem

Finally, on Tue May 16 13:11:27 2006, Kevin Wall wrote…
To: Gary McGraw
Subject: RE: [SC-L] New podcast (sneak preview)

Gary,

Well, I’m glad to here that you hadn’t given in to the partial lobotomy (which seems to be mandatory with most organizations I’ve worked with) or been abducted and brainwashed by space aliens. ;-)

I guess I’m just overly sensitive to the “Silver Bullet” name because at least twice in the past, at two different companies I’ve worked for, I’ve had to work with IT development organizations who in all seriousness had officially named themselves something like “Silver Bullet Organization” and THEY were not doing it for the irony….they were just clueless and had never read Brooks’ Silver Bullet CACM article.

—-
That’s when Gary asked me to post this thread on the comments to the website. So, while I remembered my Brooks, I forgot that other famous sage whose name starts with ‘B’ and who incorrectly is credited with saying “there’s a sucker born every minute”. Sigh. Somebody give me a blanket to hide under. (And make it a wool one, to go with my sheepish grin.)

Regards,
-kevin wall

]]>