<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How do companies address security testing?</title>
	<link>http://www.cigital.com/justiceleague/2008/03/31/how-do-companies-address-security-testing/</link>
	<description>The Cigital Software Security and Quality Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Justice League &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Penetration Testing Security Testing? [Cigital]</title>
		<link>http://www.cigital.com/justiceleague/2008/03/31/how-do-companies-address-security-testing/#comment-7636</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 14:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.cigital.com/justiceleague/2008/03/31/how-do-companies-address-security-testing/#comment-7636</guid>
					<description>[...] Because black box tools to a large extent run canned tests they will not satisfy my security testing goal (see previous entry) of having run tests that one traces back to requirements. &#8216;Requirements that one created as a result of doing risk analysis that determines exactly what behaviors (and their impacts) should be avoided were the software attacked. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Because black box tools to a large extent run canned tests they will not satisfy my security testing goal (see previous entry) of having run tests that one traces back to requirements. &#8216;Requirements that one created as a result of doing risk analysis that determines exactly what behaviors (and their impacts) should be avoided were the software attacked. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
